I don’t understand why the attacks on NATO and ISAF soldiers by members of the Afghan Army are called “green-on-blue” attacks. Given the colour of the uniforms, shouldn’t they be called “blue-on-green” attacks?
-
Recent Posts
- Did you notice the Irony? (8) FEMEN vs. Barbie
- “The Life of Pie”
- Child Safety in America
- Easily Confused (26) Feminism
- UN: Eat more Insects to fight World Hunger
- Easily Confused (25) Castro Brothers
- Did you notice the Irony? (7) Guantanamo
- Easily Confused (24) Converters
- Charles Ramsey is Burma Jones
- Shortcuts
Categories
Afghanistan auf Deutsch Books China Cold War Death Economics Education Elections Environment Estonia Europe Facebook Family Law Feminism Films Food France German Law Germany Greece Health History Holocaust Human Rights Hungary Immigration Law Iran Islam Israel Italy James Bond Language Latvia Law Libya Life Lithuania London Malta Maps Marriage Media Military Music North Korea Philosophy Photography Poland Politics Polls Religion Russia Saudi Arabia Scams Sports Statistics Syria Technology Terrorism Time Travel UK Uncategorized USA World War II
If you seriously don’t know, it’s because in military games from the Cold War, the “good” guys (the US) were always represented as blue, and the Soviets as red. (Interestingly, the Soviet leaders assigned red to their forces, and blue to ours as well.) Since the Afghan forces are supposedly friendly, we can’t use red to represent them, and if we group them with our forces, it technically becomes fratricide (or that horrible phrase “friendly fire”). Hence the Afghans become “green” – mostly friendly (blue) but with a cautionary element (yellow) making green.
And if you were just kidding, I just wasted minutes of your time burying you in information you already had. OOPS! :D
Green –> Islamic Green?
I don’t believe the colour was meant for any religious alignment. I’m fairly certain that any religious alignment is accepted into the Afghani forces, including Shia, Sunni, and Aloite(?) Muslims, as well as Christian (I forget their group name) and Kurd. I would certainly hope NATO knows well enough not to mix natural foes like Shia and Sunni in the same unit – but then I consider the oxymoron of “military intelligence”. ;)
I seriously did not know that. Thank you very much!
Naming fictious countries after colours seems to be a general military habit: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-21977746.html (Sorry, this is only available in German, but maybe Google translate will work well enough to let you grasp the key points if you don’t speak German).
Ich denke Goethe weint.